btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
- Messages
- 46,707(7.66/day)
- Location
- Hyderabad, India
System Specs
System Name | RBMK-1000 |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 5700G |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming |
Cooling | DeepCool Gammax L240 V2 |
Memory | 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X |
Video Card(s) | Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock |
Storage | Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB |
Display(s) | BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch |
Case | Corsair Carbide 100R |
Audio Device(s) | ASUS SupremeFX S1220A |
Power Supply | Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W |
Mouse | ASUS ROG Strix Impact |
Keyboard | Gamdias Hermes E2 |
Software | Windows 11 Pro |
- Jun 11, 2024
- #1
An AMD Ryzen 5 9600X "Zen 5" processor engineering sample has been overclocked to 5.70 GHz on all cores, and put through the CPU-Z Benchmark. Here, the chip is found to score 871 points in the single-thread benchmark, and 7096 points in the multithreaded benchmark. The overclock to 5.70 GHz is significant, as this is the maximum boost frequency of the upcoming Ryzen 9 9950X flagship part. The single-thread benchmark highlights that "Zen 5" has a similar IPC to the "Raptor Cove" P-core of the Intel Core i9-14900K processor, while the 7096 points multithreaded score is higher than the that of the Ryzen 7 5800X "Zen 3," meaning that AMD is overcoming the deficit of two whole cores (33% of the core-count of the 9600X) with just IPC and faster memory. AMD is expected to launch the Ryzen 9000 series desktop processors in July 2024.
View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
Prima.Vera
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2011
- Messages
- 6,543(1.40/day)
System Specs
Processor | Intel® Core™ i7-13700K |
---|---|
Motherboard | Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 |
Memory | 32GB(2x16) DDR5@6600MHz G-Skill Trident Z5 |
Video Card(s) | ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo |
Storage | 2TB SK Platinum P41 SSD + 4TB SanDisk Ultra SSD + 500GB Samsung 840 EVO SSD |
Display(s) | Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync |
Case | NZXT PHANTOM410-BK |
Audio Device(s) | Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe |
Power Supply | Corsair 850W |
Mouse | Logitech Hero G502 SE |
Software | Windows 11 Pro - 64bit |
Benchmark Scores | 30FPS in NFS:Rivals |
- Jun 11, 2024
- #2
OK. What is the score under normal operation?
Bwaze
- Joined
- May 11, 2018
- Messages
- 1,022(0.46/day)
- Jun 11, 2024
- #3
"871 points in the single-thread benchmark"
That's lower than stock 13900K. I know that all core overclocking of Zen processors significantly lowers their single thread results, but come on, this is supposedly max boost frequency...
J
Jism
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2010
- Messages
- 2,129(0.43/day)
- Jun 11, 2024
- #4
Bwaze said:
"871 points in the single-thread benchmark"
That's lower than stock 13900K. I know that all core overclocking of Zen processors significantly lowers their single thread results, but come on, this is supposedly max boost frequency...
CPU-Z is using a outdated benchmark. It scores well on intel but does not take advantage of (new) codepath on ZEN CPU's.
- Joined
- May 30, 2015
- Messages
- 1,886(0.57/day)
- Location
- Seattle, WA
- Jun 11, 2024
- #5
Bwaze said:
"871 points in the single-thread benchmark"
That's lower than stock 13900K. I know that all core overclocking of Zen processors significantly lowers their single thread results, but come on, this is supposedly max boost frequency...
A 3.5% difference in a benchmark that swings either way seemingly at random (See: Zen 1's CPU-Z results) despite what the effective IPC actually is. Curious about the power draw though, CPU-Z's 17.01 bench really does nothing to push Ryzen chips that hard, usually 10-15% below TDP even on, "stress test".
L
londiste
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2017
- Messages
- 3,578(1.33/day)
System Specs
Processor | R5 5600X |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASUS ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING |
Cooling | Alpenföhn Black Ridge |
Memory | 2*16GB DDR4-2666 VLP @3800 |
Video Card(s) | EVGA Geforce RTX 3080 XC3 |
Storage | 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p |
Display(s) | ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W |
Case | Dan Cases A4-SFX |
Power Supply | Corsair SF600 |
Mouse | Corsair Ironclaw Wireless RGB |
Keyboard | Corsair K60 |
VR HMD | HTC Vive |
- Jun 11, 2024
- #6
What's the power consumption like at that frequency?
C
Crackong
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2019
- Messages
- 1,583(0.81/day)
System Specs
System Name | Personal Gaming Rig |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 7800X3D |
Motherboard | MSI X670E Carbon |
Cooling | MO-RA 3 420 |
Memory | 32GB 6000MHz |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4090 ICHILL FROSTBITE ULTRA |
Storage | 4x 2TB Nvme |
Display(s) | Samsung G8 OLED |
Case | Silverstone FT04 |
- Jun 11, 2024
- #7
Don't worry.
CPU-Z fixed this bug at Zen1 era
U
usiname
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
- Messages
- 378(0.29/day)
System Specs
Processor | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASRock B650M PG Riptide |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 |
Memory | DDR5 6000Mhz CL28 32GB |
Video Card(s) | Nvidia Geforce RTX 3070 Palit GamingPro OC |
Storage | Corsair MP600 Force Series Gen.4 1TB |
- Jun 11, 2024
- #8
Bwaze said:
"871 points in the single-thread benchmark"
That's lower than stock 13900K. I know that all core overclocking of Zen processors significantly lowers their single thread results, but come on, this is supposedly max boost frequency...
CPU-Z's benchmark is just userbenchmark 2, with countless updates that make the ryzen to perform worse since gen 1. In the old version from 2016 before the first ryzen the Zen 4 is faster in single core than 13th and 14th gen Intel
JWNoctis
- Joined
- May 22, 2024
- Messages
- 136(4.39/day)
System Specs
System Name | Kuro |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D@65W |
Motherboard | MSI MAG B650 Tomahawk WiFi |
Cooling | Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO |
Memory | Corsair DDR5 6000C30 2x48GB (Hynix M)@6000 30-36-36-48 1.36V |
Video Card(s) | PNY XLR8 RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 16G@200W |
Storage | Crucial T500 2TB + WD Blue 8TB |
Case | Lian Li LANCOOL 216 |
Audio Device(s) | Sound Blaster AE-7 |
Power Supply | MSI MPG A850G |
Software | Ubuntu 24.04 LTS + Windows 10 Home Build 19045 |
Benchmark Scores | 17761 C23 Multi@65W |
- Jun 11, 2024
- #9
Meanwhile, Apple's M3/M4 struts about like a heron among a flock of geese, only to be hampered by their closed ecosystem and so-far limited market.
Both AMD and Intel need to raise the level of their game. More clock and IPC certainly would be a step in the right direction.
L
londiste
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2017
- Messages
- 3,578(1.33/day)
System Specs
Processor | R5 5600X |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASUS ROG STRIX B550-I GAMING |
Cooling | Alpenföhn Black Ridge |
Memory | 2*16GB DDR4-2666 VLP @3800 |
Video Card(s) | EVGA Geforce RTX 3080 XC3 |
Storage | 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p |
Display(s) | ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W |
Case | Dan Cases A4-SFX |
Power Supply | Corsair SF600 |
Mouse | Corsair Ironclaw Wireless RGB |
Keyboard | Corsair K60 |
VR HMD | HTC Vive |
- Jun 11, 2024
- #10
JWNoctis said:
Meanwhile, Apple's M3/M4 struts about like a heron among a flock of geese, only to be hampered by their closed ecosystem and so-far limited market.
Both AMD and Intel need to raise the level of their game. More clock and IPC certainly would be a step in the right direction.
Where are Apple M3 in terms of clock speeds? 4GHz? Especially AMD but also Intel chips are also pretty damn efficient at that frequency
R
ratirt
- Joined
- May 31, 2016
- Messages
- 4,351(1.48/day)
- Location
- Currently Norway
System Specs
System Name | Bro2 |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5800X |
Motherboard | Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite |
Cooling | Corsair h115i pro rgb |
Memory | 32GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16 |
Video Card(s) | Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz |
Storage | M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB |
Display(s) | LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950 |
Case | Fractal Design G |
Audio Device(s) | Realtec 5.1 |
Power Supply | Seasonic 750W GOLD |
Mouse | Logitech G402 |
Keyboard | Logitech slim |
Software | Windows 10 64 bit |
- Jun 11, 2024
- #11
londiste said:
Where are Apple M3 in terms of clock speeds? 4GHz? Especially AMD but also Intel chips are also pretty damn efficient at that frequency
No to mention, 4 efficiency cores 2.4 GHZ max and 4 performance cores 4.06Ghz max for an 8core chip, and people are amazed about the power consumption.
Intel would probably smash it with 4p+4e at that frequency running on an AAA batteries pff
Still don't understand, why would the OC Ryzen? Let the board and CPU manage the speed and power. That is the best way for Ryzen's in my opinion. Other you gain here and lose there. Pretty sure it is not worth it.
Metroid
- Jun 11, 2024
- #12
My ryzen 5900x at 3.9ghz v0.9 does st = 534, mt = 7900. It has 12 cores 24 threads, meaning the new 9600x with 6 cores 12 threads is almost on par with my 5900x, pretty good. I wonder clock per clock how would that do.
R
R0H1T
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2013
- Messages
- 6,909(1.69/day)
- Jun 11, 2024
- #13
An 8c/16t zen 5/6(c) only "light" cores with say LPDDR6 should be interesting wrt efficiency. People don't realize how controlling the entire ecosystem by Apple is such a massive advantage for them!
U
usiname
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
- Messages
- 378(0.29/day)
System Specs
Processor | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASRock B650M PG Riptide |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 |
Memory | DDR5 6000Mhz CL28 32GB |
Video Card(s) | Nvidia Geforce RTX 3070 Palit GamingPro OC |
Storage | Corsair MP600 Force Series Gen.4 1TB |
- Jun 11, 2024
- #14
ratirt said:
Still don't understand, why would the OC Ryzen? Let the board and CPU manage the speed and power. That is the best way for Ryzen's in my opinion. Other you gain here and lose there. Pretty sure it is not worth it.
"Let the board and CPU manage the speed and power." This is the worst possible, manual OC or undervolt is way better in terms of performance and power consumption
Example with my 7600x
Default 1.35V, 5.2Ghz max single core 5.1Ghz all core, 90W
Fixed voltage 1.2V, 5.4Ghz single and all core, 77W
Fixed voltage 1V, 5Ghz single and all core, 43W
This is tested in cinebench
Last edited:
R
R0H1T
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2013
- Messages
- 6,909(1.69/day)
- Jun 11, 2024
- #15
The light cores are probably the most energy efficient in AMD's lineup right now!
R
ratirt
- Joined
- May 31, 2016
- Messages
- 4,351(1.48/day)
- Location
- Currently Norway
System Specs
System Name | Bro2 |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5800X |
Motherboard | Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite |
Cooling | Corsair h115i pro rgb |
Memory | 32GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16 |
Video Card(s) | Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz |
Storage | M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB |
Display(s) | LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950 |
Case | Fractal Design G |
Audio Device(s) | Realtec 5.1 |
Power Supply | Seasonic 750W GOLD |
Mouse | Logitech G402 |
Keyboard | Logitech slim |
Software | Windows 10 64 bit |
- Jun 11, 2024
- #16
usiname said:
"Let the board and CPU manage the speed and power." This is the worst possible, manual OC or undervolt is way better in terms of performance and power consumption
With my 5800x OC is pointless. Undervolting can be beneficial but it does not work in a way to make a noticeable difference and can't be applied to all CPUs with the same values. That is not the case. Leaving the defaults gives you balanced performance and I'm sure this is the best way to go.
I really can't see why this particular situation would change to better for upcoming Ryzens.
Gigaherz
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2024
- Messages
- 27(0.44/day)
System Specs
System Name | Main Workstation |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX PBO 3,6-4,2Ghz |
Motherboard | Gigabyte x399 Aorus Pro (ReBAR patched) |
Cooling | Alphacool Eisbaer Aurora Pro 420 |
Memory | 8x16GB (128) Kingston Fury RGB @3200Mts 16-18-18-36-74 2T |
Video Card(s) | RTX 3090 ROG Gaming OC @1500Mhz (1965Boost) |
Storage | Corsair MP510 |
Power Supply | EVGA Super Nova 1000GT |
- Jun 11, 2024
- #17
Bwaze said:
I know that all core overclocking of Zen processors significantly lowers their single thread results,
It doesnt. You just most of the time end up on a lower allcore frequency than sinclecore cause of stability - doesnt automatically mean allcore oc lowers SC performance tho.
If you get static allcore oc above stock boost on allcore, you will ofc achieve higher SC results too.
U
usiname
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
- Messages
- 378(0.29/day)
System Specs
Processor | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASRock B650M PG Riptide |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 |
Memory | DDR5 6000Mhz CL28 32GB |
Video Card(s) | Nvidia Geforce RTX 3070 Palit GamingPro OC |
Storage | Corsair MP600 Force Series Gen.4 1TB |
- Jun 11, 2024
- #18
ratirt said:
With my 5800x OC is pointless. Undervolting can be beneficial but it does not work in a way to make a noticeable difference and can't be applied to all CPUs with the same values. That is not the case. Leaving the defaults gives you balanced performance and I'm sure this is the best way to go.
I really can't see why this particular situation would change to better for upcoming Ryzens.
I had ryzen 5500 and the situation was the same as with Zen 4. I could choose between 10% lower powerconsumption with 100-200 Mhz over the default or ~30-40% lower power consumption for 5% lower performance. But yes, Zen4 is better in this than Zen3
R
R0H1T
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2013
- Messages
- 6,909(1.69/day)
- Jun 11, 2024
- #19
Gigaherz said:
If you get static allcore oc above stock boost on allcore, you will ofc achieve higher SC results too.
You generally get higher clocks or ST scores with PBO2+offset it's also the most efficient way to OC as far as I'm aware. Most reviews I've seen always put PBO scores at or near the top as compared to manual OC, so no unless you're setting just the one core to boost ridiculously high & the rest like -500MHz compared to that manual OC will not net you the best SC results.
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2020
- Messages
- 5,113(4.01/day)
- Location
- São Paulo, Brazil
System Specs
System Name | Project Kairi Mk. IV "Eternal Thunder" |
---|---|
Processor | 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition |
Motherboard | MSI MEG Z690 ACE (MS-7D27) BIOS 1G |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15S + NF-F12 industrialPPC-3000 w/ Thermalright BCF and NT-H1 |
Memory | G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5-6800 F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 6400 MT/s 30-38-38-38-70-2 |
Video Card(s) | ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition |
Storage | 1x WD Black SN750 500 GB NVMe + 4x WD VelociRaptor HLFS 300 GB HDDs |
Display(s) | 55-inch LG G3 OLED |
Case | Cooler Master MasterFrame 700 |
Audio Device(s) | EVGA Nu Audio (classic) + Sony MDR-V7 cans |
Power Supply | EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold |
Mouse | Microsoft Ocean Plastic Mouse |
Keyboard | Galax Stealth |
Software | Windows 10 Enterprise 22H2 |
Benchmark Scores | "Speed isn't life, it just makes it go faster." |
- Jun 11, 2024
- #20
Jism said:
CPU-Z is using a outdated benchmark. It scores well on intel but does not take advantage of (new) codepath on ZEN CPU's.
This is not a codepath issue, it's that the 2017 benchmark (default on CPU-Z) is not vectorized. The 2019 ones should post great scores with a manual setting since they use AVX, as long as the chip can do it without thermal or current throttling. This is plenty fast for SSE, let's be realistic here.
usiname said:
CPU-Z's benchmark is just userbenchmark 2, with countless updates that make the ryzen to perform worse since gen 1. In the old version from 2016 before the first ryzen the Zen 4 is faster in single core than 13th and 14th gen Intel
Hold steady there fella. A little early for you AMD boys to be huffing the copium. There haven't been "countless updates to make Ryzen perform worse", there is no grand conspiracy at play here. This is just one benchmark out of many, and as others have pointed out in this thread, it's not universally representative of performance. I think this score is actually amazing for a Ryzen 5-class processor.
U
usiname
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2020
- Messages
- 378(0.29/day)
System Specs
Processor | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASRock B650M PG Riptide |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15 |
Memory | DDR5 6000Mhz CL28 32GB |
Video Card(s) | Nvidia Geforce RTX 3070 Palit GamingPro OC |
Storage | Corsair MP600 Force Series Gen.4 1TB |
- Jun 11, 2024
- #21
Dr. Dro said:
Hold steady there fella. A little early for you AMD boys to be huffing the copium. There haven't been "countless updates to make Ryzen perform worse", there is no grand conspiracy at play here. This is just one benchmark out of many, and as others have pointed out in this thread, it's not universally representative of performance. I think this score is actually amazing for a Ryzen 5-class processor.
Name one benchmark updated to favor AMD and I will name 5 updated to favor intel
C
Carillon
- Joined
- May 7, 2020
- Messages
- 66(0.04/day)
- Jun 11, 2024
- #22
with just IPC and faster memory
and substantially higher clocks
R
R0H1T
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2013
- Messages
- 6,909(1.69/day)
- Jun 11, 2024
- #23
Dr. Dro said:
There haven't been "countless updates to make Ryzen perform worse", there is no grand conspiracy at play here.
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean
M
marios15
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2016
- Messages
- 89(0.03/day)
- Jun 11, 2024
- #24
R0H1T said:
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean
He's right though, CPUZ default benchmark algorithm was replaced with a different codepath to reduce scores on Ryzen (supposedly to match "expected performance") because the benchmark would run extremely fast on Zen microarchitecture due to its cache.
Imagine a game releasing a patch that made the game slower because it's "running too fast" on a new architecture
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2020
- Messages
- 5,113(4.01/day)
- Location
- São Paulo, Brazil
System Specs
System Name | Project Kairi Mk. IV "Eternal Thunder" |
---|---|
Processor | 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900KS Special Edition |
Motherboard | MSI MEG Z690 ACE (MS-7D27) BIOS 1G |
Cooling | Noctua NH-D15S + NF-F12 industrialPPC-3000 w/ Thermalright BCF and NT-H1 |
Memory | G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB 32GB DDR5-6800 F5-6800J3445G16GX2-TZ5RK @ 6400 MT/s 30-38-38-38-70-2 |
Video Card(s) | ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX™ 4080 16GB GDDR6X White OC Edition |
Storage | 1x WD Black SN750 500 GB NVMe + 4x WD VelociRaptor HLFS 300 GB HDDs |
Display(s) | 55-inch LG G3 OLED |
Case | Cooler Master MasterFrame 700 |
Audio Device(s) | EVGA Nu Audio (classic) + Sony MDR-V7 cans |
Power Supply | EVGA 1300 G2 1.3kW 80+ Gold |
Mouse | Microsoft Ocean Plastic Mouse |
Keyboard | Galax Stealth |
Software | Windows 10 Enterprise 22H2 |
Benchmark Scores | "Speed isn't life, it just makes it go faster." |
- Jun 11, 2024
- #25
marios15 said:
He's right though, CPUZ default benchmark algorithm was replaced with a different codepath to reduce scores on Ryzen (supposedly to match "expected performance") because the benchmark would run extremely fast on Zen microarchitecture due to its cache.
Imagine a game releasing a patch that made the game slower because it's "running too fast" on a new architecture
Should be simple enough to solve that dispute. Here's my score on the CPU-Z 2015 benchmark. It doesn't have the faintest clue about how Raptor Lake works, so I suspect these scores are about as worthless as it comes. Still of academic interest, considering the cache sizes on Raptor Lake are larger than even that of the first Ryzen Threadripper processors. Anyone on Zen 4 X3D to step up?
Download link: https://www.cpuid.com/downloads/cpu-z/cpu-z_1.78-en.zip
You must log in or register to reply here.